Hot topics close

Vince McMahon's Return to WWE Helm Draws Investor Litigation (1)

Vince McMahons Return to WWE Helm Draws Investor Litigation 1
WWE Inc. chief Vince McMahon—who returned to the company in early January after resigning amid a wave of sexual harassment allegations—is facing investor litigation over claims that he pushed aside the board to illegally install himself as chairman.

WWE Inc. chief Vince McMahon—who returned to the company in early January after resigning amid a wave of sexual harassment allegations—is facing investor litigation over claims that he pushed aside the board to illegally install himself as chairman.

A shareholder sued McMahon in Delaware’s Chancery Court, accusing him of wielding his 81% voting control to oust three board members, replace them with loyalists, and push through bylaw changes that would “impose his will on the board and WWE.”

A spokesperson for McMahon and WWE didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment Wednesday.

The dispute Tuesday comes about six months after McMahon stepped down as chairman and CEO in the face of allegations that he had paid $12 million over more than 15 years to keep a lid on sexual harassment accusations by women both within and outside the company.

McMahon’s recent moves have reinserted him as the head of a WWE royal family he spent decades leading, both behind the scenes and on screen. His daughter, Stephanie McMahon, who resigned as co-CEO and chairwoman Tuesday, is married to another top executive, former WWE champion Paul “Triple H” Levesque.

According to the proposed class action, McMahon timed his return to seize control of upcoming negotiations over the company’s expiring media rights, the “lifeblood” of the business, and forced his way back by leveraging a threat to withhold support for any deal reached without his participation.

But the move to “take complete personal control over any major corporate decision” by “adding his cronies to the board” violates Delaware law, the suit says.

Causes of Action: Section 141 of the Delaware General Corporation Law; breach of fiduciary duty.

Relief: Invalidation of the bylaw changes; costs and fees.

Potential Class Size: Thousands of holders of 43.3 million WWE shares, according to the complaint.

Attorneys: The investor leading the case, Scott Fellows, is represented by Labaton Sucharow LLP, Friedlander & Gorris PA, Friedman Oster & Tejtel PLLC, and Kaskela Law LLC.

The case is Fellows v. McMahon, Del. Ch., No. 2023-0022, complaint filed 1/10/23.

Similar shots
News Archive
  • Wa borders
    Wa borders
    Western Australia to remove hard border from November 14
    30 Oct 2020
    1
  • Fire
    Fire
    Sydney news: Total fire ban issued in Riverina as BOM forecasts sweltering weather
    24 Jan 2021
    1
  • Stuart Broad
    Stuart Broad
    Stuart Broad arranges farewell Test to his liking as bandana bows out
    30 Jul 2023
    11
  • Brayden Erbacher
    Brayden Erbacher
    'Shattered beyond words': Motocross rider dies in national champs ...
    6 Mar 2023
    3
  • Paul Dear
    Paul Dear
    Hawthorn mourns death of AFL premiership winner Paul Dear at age 55
    9 Jul 2022
    1
This week's most popular shots